From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeder v. Holdridge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 15, 2012
09-CV-575 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2012)

Opinion

09-CV-575

10-15-2012

RASZELL REEDER, Plaintiff, v. D. HOLDRIDGE, Captain; MENARD, Sergeant; BAKER, Sergeant; RONALD DURMONT, Registered Nurse and Examiner; MOLLER, Correctional Officer; TUCKER, Correctional Officer; MARTIN, Correctional Officer; SHUTTS, C.O.; GROM, C.O.; POUPORE, Correctional Officer; BOULRICE, C.O.; MOSELEY, C.O.; TRUDEAU, Correctional Officer; ALLEN, Correctional Officer; GITTENS, Correctional Officer; BESAW, Correctional Officer; TETREAULT, C.O.; NUNEZ, Inspector General, Defendants.

RASZELL REEDER Plaintiff Pro Se HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN New York State Attorney General Attorney for Defendants OF COUNSEL: ADRIENNE J. KERWIN, ESQ. Ass't Attorney General


(DNH/CFH)

APPEARANCES: RASZELL REEDER
Plaintiff Pro Se
HON. ERIC T. SCHNEIDERMAN
New York State Attorney General
Attorney for Defendants
OF COUNSEL: ADRIENNE J. KERWIN, ESQ.
Ass't Attorney General
DAVID N. HURD
United States District Judge

DECISION and ORDER

Plaintiff brought this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On September 5, 2012, the Honorable Christian F. Hummel, United States Magistrate Judge, advised, by Report-Recommendation, that defendants' motion for summary judgment be denied as to plaintiff's claims of excessive force against defendants Menard, Martin, Shutts, and Tucker, and granted as to all other claims and all other moving defendants and that the complaint be dismissed with prejudice as to those defendants. Plaintiff timely filed objections to the Report-Recommendation.

Based upon a de novo review, the Report-Recommendation is accepted in whole. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1).

Therefore, it is

ORDERED that

1. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED in part and GRANTED in part;
2. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to plaintiff's claims of excessive force against defendants Menard, Martin, Shutts, and Tucker;
3. Defendants' motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to all other claims and all other moving defendants; and
4. The complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice as to defendants D. Holdridge, Baker, Ronald Durmont, Moller, Grom, Poupore, Boulrice, Moseley, Trudeau, Allen, Gittens, Besaw, Tetreault, and Nunez.

IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated: October 15, 2012

Utica, New York.

______________

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Reeder v. Holdridge

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Oct 15, 2012
09-CV-575 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2012)
Case details for

Reeder v. Holdridge

Case Details

Full title:RASZELL REEDER, Plaintiff, v. D. HOLDRIDGE, Captain; MENARD, Sergeant…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Oct 15, 2012

Citations

09-CV-575 (N.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2012)