From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reeder v. Healey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)

Opinion

May, 1936.

Present — Martin, P.J., Glennon, Untermyer, Dore and Cohn, JJ.


Order denying plaintiff's motion to strike out the defenses and counterclaims set forth in the amended answers of the defendants unanimously modified by striking the third affirmative defense and the first, second and third counterclaims from the answer of defendant Giles G. Healey; and also by striking out the two defenses interposed by The Birconjel Corporation to the second cause of action, and as so modified affirmed, with twenty dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. No opinion.


Summaries of

Reeder v. Healey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 1, 1936
248 App. Div. 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)
Case details for

Reeder v. Healey

Case Details

Full title:SHERMA A. REEDER, Suing Individually and in Behalf of Herself and All…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1936

Citations

248 App. Div. 554 (N.Y. App. Div. 1936)