From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Wilson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 19, 2023
2:23-cv-02171 AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2023)

Opinion

2:23-cv-02171 AC

12-19-2023

ZAYA S. REED, Plaintiff, v. K. WILSON, Defendant.


ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ALLISON CLAIRE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On October 26, 2023, plaintiff was ordered to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of her prison trust account statement, and was cautioned that failure to do so would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. The thirty day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court's order and has not filed the required documents.

In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to randomly assign a district judge to this case; and

IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice.

These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court and serve a copy on all parties. Such a document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendations.” Plaintiff is advised that failure to file objections within the specified time may waive the right to appeal the District Court's order. Martinez v. Ylst, 951 F.2d 1153 (9th Cir. 1991).


Summaries of

Reed v. Wilson

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Dec 19, 2023
2:23-cv-02171 AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2023)
Case details for

Reed v. Wilson

Case Details

Full title:ZAYA S. REED, Plaintiff, v. K. WILSON, Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Dec 19, 2023

Citations

2:23-cv-02171 AC (E.D. Cal. Dec. 19, 2023)