From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 7, 2010
No. 2:05-cv-0060 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2010)

Opinion

No. 2:05-cv-0060 JAM KJN P.

December 7, 2010


ORDER


On November 9, 2010, plaintiff filed a request for reconsideration of the magistrate judge's order filed November 3, 2010, denying plaintiff's request to call inmate Larry Lavell as a witness at trial. Pursuant to E.D. Local Rule 303(f), a magistrate judge's orders shall be upheld unless "clearly erroneous or contrary to law." Upon review of the entire file, the court finds that it does not appear that the magistrate judge's ruling was clearly erroneous or contrary to law.

Therefore, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, upon reconsideration, the order of the magistrate judge filed November 3, 2010, is affirmed.

DATED: 12/6/2010


Summaries of

Reed v. Williams

United States District Court, E.D. California
Dec 7, 2010
No. 2:05-cv-0060 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2010)
Case details for

Reed v. Williams

Case Details

Full title:RONALD REED, Plaintiff, v. B. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Dec 7, 2010

Citations

No. 2:05-cv-0060 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Dec. 7, 2010)