From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Tidwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00927-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2013)

Opinion

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00927-MSK-MEH

04-11-2013

NORMAN RAY REED, JR., Plaintiff, v. MIKE TIDWELL, in his professional and individual capacities, EVE LITTLE, in her professional and individual capacities, CHARLES HIGGINS, in his professional and individual capacities, and MICHELLE NYCZHALLIGAN, in her professional and individual capacities, Defendants.


ORDER

Michael E. Hegarty, United States Magistrate Judge.

This matter comes before the Court sua sponte, pursuant to the Court's April 3, 2013 Order to Show Cause directing Plaintiff to explain in writing his failure to prosecute this action and failure to comply with his in forma pauperis obligations on or before April 10, 2013. (Docket #47.) Given Plaintiff's pro se status, the Court recognizes that this may not have been a sufficient amount of time for the Plaintiff to respond. Therefore, in the interests of justice and efficiency, the Court hereby ORDERS Plaintiff to respond to the Court's April 3, 2013 Order to Show Cause on or before April 24, 2013. Failure to do so will result in a recommendation of dismissal without further notice.

Dated and entered this 11th day of April, 2013, in Denver, Colorado.

BY THE COURT:

Michael E. Hegarty

United States Magistrate Judge


Summaries of

Reed v. Tidwell

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO
Apr 11, 2013
Civil Action No. 12-cv-00927-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2013)
Case details for

Reed v. Tidwell

Case Details

Full title:NORMAN RAY REED, JR., Plaintiff, v. MIKE TIDWELL, in his professional and…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO

Date published: Apr 11, 2013

Citations

Civil Action No. 12-cv-00927-MSK-MEH (D. Colo. Apr. 11, 2013)