From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Sep 5, 2018
NO. 1:16-CV-173-DMB-DAS (N.D. Miss. Sep. 5, 2018)

Opinion

NO. 1:16-CV-173-DMB-DAS

09-05-2018

RAY REED PLAINTIFF v. JOHN THOMAS, et al. DEFENDANTS


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION

On April 11, 2018, United States Magistrate Judge David A. Sanders issued a Report and Recommendation recommending that this case be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Doc. #18. Ray Reed acknowledged receipt of the Report and Recommendation and did not file any objections. Doc. #20.

Where no objections to a report and recommendation have been filed, a "Court need only satisfy itself that there is no plain error on the face of the record." Gauthier v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 644 F.Supp.2d 824, 828 (E.D. Tex. 2009) (citing Douglass v. United Servs. Auto. Ass'n, 79 F.3d 1415, 1428-29 (5th Cir. 1996)). This Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and found no plain error. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation [18] is ADOPTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. A separate judgment consistent with this Order will be entered separately.

SO ORDERED, this 5th day of September, 2018.

/s/ Debra M. Brown

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Reed v. Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION
Sep 5, 2018
NO. 1:16-CV-173-DMB-DAS (N.D. Miss. Sep. 5, 2018)
Case details for

Reed v. Thomas

Case Details

Full title:RAY REED PLAINTIFF v. JOHN THOMAS, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF MISSISSIPPI ABERDEEN DIVISION

Date published: Sep 5, 2018

Citations

NO. 1:16-CV-173-DMB-DAS (N.D. Miss. Sep. 5, 2018)