From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1026 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-1026 JAM KJN P

08-22-2011

GREGORY DWAYNE REED, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, Respondent.


ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On July 14, 2011, respondent filed a motion to dismiss on the grounds that petitioner failed to state a cognizable claim. Petitioner has not filed an opposition to the motion. Local Rule 230(l) provides in part: "Failure of the responding party to file written opposition or to file a statement of no opposition may be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion . . . ."

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner show cause, within thirty days, why his failure to oppose respondent's July 14, 2011 motion to dismiss should not be deemed a waiver of any opposition to the granting of the motion, or he shall file an opposition. Petitioner is cautioned that failure to respond to the instant order, or to file an opposition to the pending motion to dismiss, will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed.

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Reed v. Swarthout

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 22, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-1026 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)
Case details for

Reed v. Swarthout

Case Details

Full title:GREGORY DWAYNE REED, Petitioner, v. GARY SWARTHOUT, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 22, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-1026 JAM KJN P (E.D. Cal. Aug. 22, 2011)