From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 2, 2008
978 So. 2d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Opinion

No. 4D08-735.

April 2, 2008.

Appeal of order denying rule 3.850 motion from the Circuit Court for the Nineteenth Judicial Circuit, Martin County; Sherwood Bauer, Jr., and Robert E. Belanger, Judges; L.T. Case Nos. 432005CF000205A, 432005CF000748A, 432005CF000814A 432005CF00816A.

Derick Reed, South Bay, pro se.

No appearance required for appellee.


We affirm the lower court's order striking the appellant's second motion for post-conviction relief as the court correctly understood it was without jurisdiction. See Washington v State, 823 So.2d 248 (Fla. 4th DCA 2002). At the time of the filing of the motion, and at the time of the ruling, the appellant had a pending appeal in this court seeking reversal of an order denying his first rule 3.850 motion. Our affirmance is without prejudice to appellant's right to refile the motion within thirty days after this court's mandate issues in the pending appeal, case 4D07-3652, if necessary. See Charles v. State, 950 So.2d 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007).

WARNER, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District
Apr 2, 2008
978 So. 2d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)
Case details for

Reed v. State

Case Details

Full title:Derick REED, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fourth District

Date published: Apr 2, 2008

Citations

978 So. 2d 230 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2008)

Citing Cases

Reed v. State

We affirm the summary denial of appellant's motion for post-conviction relief, which appears to be at least…

Bryant v. State

This list provides merely a prime example of cases which, despite being in conflict with the modern trend,…