Opinion
18-cv-00565-RSL
12-17-2021
DONNA REED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. SCIENTIFIC GAMES CORP., a Nevada corporation, Defendant.
EDELSON PC BY TODD LOGAN, RAFEY S. BALABANIAN, BRANDT SILVER-KORN BY ALEXANDER G. TIEVSKY, JAY EDELSON, ALEXANDER G. TIEVSKY, AMY B. HAUSMANN TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC BY CECILY C. JORDAN, ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS BARTLIT BECK LLP BY DANIEL C. TAYLOR, ADAM L. HOEFLICH, DANIEL C. TAYLOR, ALISON G. WHEELER ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
EDELSON PC BY TODD LOGAN, RAFEY S. BALABANIAN, BRANDT SILVER-KORN BY ALEXANDER G. TIEVSKY, JAY EDELSON, ALEXANDER G. TIEVSKY, AMY B. HAUSMANN TOUSLEY BRAIN STEPHENS PLLC BY CECILY C. JORDAN, ATTORNEYS FOR PLAINTIFF AND THE PUTATIVE CLASS
BARTLIT BECK LLP BY DANIEL C. TAYLOR, ADAM L. HOEFLICH, DANIEL C. TAYLOR, ALISON G. WHEELER ATTORNEYS FOR DEFENDANT
STIPULATED MOTION AND ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF CASE
HONORABLE ROBERT S. LASNIK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
STIPULATED MOTION TO EXTEND STAY The Parties previously apprised the Court that they had reached a binding agreement in principle to settle this case on a class action basis. See Dkt. #158. The Parties are continuing to finalize a class action settlement agreement and request additional time to execute the agreement. The Parties therefore jointly seek to extend the stay of this case through January 17, 2022, by which time the Parties anticipate that Plaintiff will have filed preliminary approval papers. The Parties do not presently anticipate requiring any additional extensions of the stay.
Consequently, pursuant to Local Civil Rule 10(g), the Parties respectfully request that the Court grant this stipulation and enter the attached Proposed Order.
IT IS SO STIPULATED, THROUGH COUNSEL OF RECORD.
ORDER
This case is STAYED for all purposes through January 17, 2022.
IT IS SO ORDERED.