From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Reed

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 28, 1913
95 S.C. 130 (S.C. 1913)

Opinion

8590

June 28, 1913.

Before GAGE, J., Richland, December, 1912. Affirmed.

Action by Mable Reed against J.W. Reed. Defendant appeals.

Mr. Robert Moorman, for appellant, cites: 60 S.C. 448; 4 DeS. Eq. 33; 10 Rich. Eq. 176; 91 S.C. 245; 1 McC. Eq. 117. Messrs. Pringle T. Youmans and J. Hugh Cooper, contra.


June 28, 1913. The opinion of the Court was delivered by


This is an action for alimony. His Honor, Judge Gage, granted temporary alimony and counsel fees. From this order the defendant appealed. There are two exceptions as follows:

1. "That upon the showing and counter showing made before him on December 11th, 1912, his Honor, Judge Gage, erred in holding that plaintiff had made out a prima facie case for temporary alimony and counsel fees.

2. "It is respectfully submitted that his Honor, J. Judge Gage, abused the discretion imposed in him in granting said order for temporary alimony and counsel fees."

These exceptions admit that the matter is in the discretion of the Circuit Judge and no abuse of discretion has been shown. See the recent case of Norman v. Norman, 94 S.C. 204; 77 S.E. Rep. 865, and cases there cited.

It is therefore ordered, that the order appealed from is affirmed.


Summaries of

Reed v. Reed

Supreme Court of South Carolina
Jun 28, 1913
95 S.C. 130 (S.C. 1913)
Case details for

Reed v. Reed

Case Details

Full title:REED v. REED

Court:Supreme Court of South Carolina

Date published: Jun 28, 1913

Citations

95 S.C. 130 (S.C. 1913)
78 S.E. 712

Citing Cases

Thomas v. Thomas

Messrs. McEachin Townsend, for appellant, cite: As toevidence to support a decree for alimony: 100 S.C. 208;…

Sandel v. State

Legal effect ofreport of Dr. Coward should have been ruled on by Court: Greenleaf Evid., secs. 483, 484, 171.…