From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Parker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Oct 29, 2012
CIV-12-414-JHP-KEW (E.D. Okla. Oct. 29, 2012)

Opinion

CIV-12-414-JHP-KEW

10-29-2012

Chad William Reed, Petitioner, v. David Parker, Respondent.


OPINION AND ORDER

Petitioner has filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S. C. § 2254. Respondent is hereby ordered to show cause why the writ should not issue by filing within thirty (30) days an answer to the petition, in accordance with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases. As an alternative to filing a Rule 5 answer, Respondent may file within thirty (30) days a motion to dismiss based upon 28 U.S.C. § 2244, 28 U.S.C. § 2254, or other applicable statute. Extensions of time will be granted for good cause only, and in no event for longer than an additional twenty (20) days. Petitioner may submit a reply to the Respondent's answer or motion within fifteen (15) days after the filing of Respondent's pleading.

IT IS SO ORDERED THIS 29th day of October, 2012.

_______________

KIMBERLY E. WEST

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Reed v. Parker

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Oct 29, 2012
CIV-12-414-JHP-KEW (E.D. Okla. Oct. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Reed v. Parker

Case Details

Full title:Chad William Reed, Petitioner, v. David Parker, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Oct 29, 2012

Citations

CIV-12-414-JHP-KEW (E.D. Okla. Oct. 29, 2012)