From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Palmer

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 9, 2013
No. 61488 (Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)

Opinion

No. 61488

04-09-2013

MAX REED, II, Appellant, v. JACK PALMER, WARDEN, Respondent.


An unpublished order shall not be regarded as precedent and shall not be cited as legal authority. SCR 123.

ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

This is a proper person appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. First Judicial District Court, Carson City; James Todd Russell, Judge.

This appeal has been submitted for decision without oral argument, NRAP 34(f)(3), and we conclude that the record is sufficient for our review and briefing is unwarranted. See Luckett v. Warden, 91 Nev. 681, 682, 541 P.2d 910, 911 (1975).

In his petition filed on June 7, 2012, appellant challenged his placement in administrative segregation. Appellant's claim for relief was not cognizable as it was a challenge to the conditions of confinement, which are not cognizable in a habeas corpus petition. See Bowen v. Warden, 100 Nev. 489, 686 P.2d 250 (1984). Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of the district court AFFIRMED.

We have received appellant's proper person filings and conclude that no relief is warranted for the reason set forth above.
--------

______________________, J.

Hardesty
______________________, J.
Parraguirre
______________________, J.
Cherry
cc: Hon. James Todd Russell, District Judge

Max Reed, II

Attorney General/Carson City

Carson City Clerk


Summaries of

Reed v. Palmer

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Apr 9, 2013
No. 61488 (Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)
Case details for

Reed v. Palmer

Case Details

Full title:MAX REED, II, Appellant, v. JACK PALMER, WARDEN, Respondent.

Court:SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Apr 9, 2013

Citations

No. 61488 (Nev. Apr. 9, 2013)