From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Newman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
31 Misc. 792 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Opinion

June, 1900.

James Murphy, for appellant.

George W. Gibbons, for respondent.


The complaint is for wages due, and plaintiff must be confined to the period during which she actually rendered services. There can be no recovery for damages for breach of contract under such a complaint. Fallon v. Farber, 30 Misc. Rep. 626; 62 N.Y.S. 742.

The judgment should, therefore, be reduced to eleven dollars and fifty cents, and as modified affirmed, without costs to either party.

Present: BEEKMAN, P.J., GIEGERICH and O'GORMAN, JJ.

Judgment modified and as modified affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Reed v. Newman

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Jun 1, 1900
31 Misc. 792 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)
Case details for

Reed v. Newman

Case Details

Full title:NANNIE REED, Respondent, v . WILLIAM W. NEWMAN, Appellant

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Jun 1, 1900

Citations

31 Misc. 792 (N.Y. App. Term 1900)

Citing Cases

Howe v. Fox, Inc.

The subsequent amendment came too late and entirely changed the cause of action. ( Reed v. Newman, 31 Misc.…