From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2018
Case No. LA CV 16-0729 PSG (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. LA CV 16-0729 PSG (JCG)

01-30-2018

ERIC STEFON REED, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM MUNIZ, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition, the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, and the remaining record, and has made a de novo determination. No objections to the Report and Recommendation have been filed. // // //

Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED THAT:

1. The Report and Recommendation is approved and accepted;

2. Judgment be entered dismissing this action with prejudice; and

3. The Clerk serve copies of this Order on the parties.

Additionally, for the reasons stated in the Report and Recommendation, the Court finds that Petitioner has not shown that "jurists of reason would find it debatable whether": (1) "the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right"; and (2) "the district court was correct in its procedural ruling." See Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000). Thus, the Court declines to issue a certificate of appealability. DATED: 1/30/18

/s/_________

HON. PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Reed v. Muniz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jan 30, 2018
Case No. LA CV 16-0729 PSG (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2018)
Case details for

Reed v. Muniz

Case Details

Full title:ERIC STEFON REED, Petitioner, v. WILLIAM MUNIZ, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jan 30, 2018

Citations

Case No. LA CV 16-0729 PSG (JCG) (C.D. Cal. Jan. 30, 2018)