From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. May

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Mar 29, 2007
5:06CV00177-WRW/BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 29, 2007)

Opinion

5:06CV00177-WRW/BD.

March 29, 2007


ORDER


The Court has received the Recommended Disposition from Magistrate Judge Beth Deere. After careful review of the Recommended Disposition, the timely objections received thereto, as well as a de novo review of the record, the Court concludes that the Recommended Disposition should be, and hereby is, approved and adopted as this Court's findings in all respects in its entirety.

Accordingly, the plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The dismissal will count as a "strike" against plaintiff under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g).

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reed v. May

United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division
Mar 29, 2007
5:06CV00177-WRW/BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 29, 2007)
Case details for

Reed v. May

Case Details

Full title:MELVIN REED ADC # 113827 PLAINTIFF v. LARRY MAY, et al. DEFENDANTS

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Arkansas, Pine Bluff Division

Date published: Mar 29, 2007

Citations

5:06CV00177-WRW/BD (E.D. Ark. Mar. 29, 2007)

Citing Cases

Indiana Nat. Bank of Indianapolis v. Goss

Philbrooks v. McEwen, 29 Ind. 347; Vance v. English, 78 Ind. 80; Hunter v. First Nat. Bank, 172 Ind. 62, 87…