From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 11, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2405 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-2405 KJM GGH P.

April 11, 2011


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. On December 6, 2010, respondent filed a motion to dismiss the petition. Petitioner did not timely respond. On February 16, 2011, the court issued an order to show cause why the motion to dismiss should not be granted. On March 10, 2011, petitioner filed a response stating that he never received respondent's motion. On March 23, 2011, respondent filed a notice that he was re-serving petitioner with the motion to dismiss.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition to the motion shall be filed and served within twenty-eight days of the date of this order, and respondent's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within fourteen days thereafter.


Summaries of

Reed v. Martel

United States District Court, E.D. California
Apr 11, 2011
No. CIV S-10-2405 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2011)
Case details for

Reed v. Martel

Case Details

Full title:CHRISTOPHER REED, Petitioner, v. MICHAEL MARTEL, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Apr 11, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-2405 KJM GGH P (E.D. Cal. Apr. 11, 2011)