From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Leatherman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 23, 2021
2:18-cv-0038KJMCKDP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)

Opinion

2:18-cv-0038KJMCKDP

09-23-2021

PETER J. REED, Plaintiff, v. D. LEATHERMAN, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

CAROLYN K. DELANEY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 23, 2021, defendants filed a motion asking that plaintiff be sanctioned for violation of a protective order. Plaintiff has not filed a response. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty-one days, plaintiff shall file a response to defendants' motion for sanctions for violation of a protective order. Failure to comply with this order will result in dismissal of this action pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).


Summaries of

Reed v. Leatherman

United States District Court, Eastern District of California
Sep 23, 2021
2:18-cv-0038KJMCKDP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)
Case details for

Reed v. Leatherman

Case Details

Full title:PETER J. REED, Plaintiff, v. D. LEATHERMAN, et al., Defendants.

Court:United States District Court, Eastern District of California

Date published: Sep 23, 2021

Citations

2:18-cv-0038KJMCKDP (E.D. Cal. Sep. 23, 2021)