From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Kostynick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1959
8 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

April 6, 1959


In an action to recover for goods sold and delivered, the appeal is from an order denying a motion to dismiss the complaint on the grounds (1) that it does not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 106, subd. 4), and (2) that the contract on which the cause of action is founded is unenforcible under the provisions of subdivision 1 of section 31 Pers. Prop. of the Personal Property Law (Rules Civ. Prac., rule 107, subd. 7). Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reed v. Kostynick

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 6, 1959
8 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Reed v. Kostynick

Case Details

Full title:RALPH REED, Respondent, v. WILLIAM KOSTYNICK, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 6, 1959

Citations

8 A.D.2d 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)