From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Haight

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00926 AWIJLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)

Opinion

Case No.: 1:11-cv-00926 AWIJLT

09-21-2011

TANNER JUNE REED, a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, PAMELA REED, Plaintiff, v. DOUGLAS DARRELL HAIGHT, et al, Defendants.


ORDER VACATING THE INITIAL

SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

Defendants initiated the action in this Court by filing a Notice of Removal on June 8, 2011. (Doc. 1). The parties filed a Notice of Settlement "contingent upon Approval of the Petition to Compromise Pending Action of Minor's Claim" on August 29, 2011. (Doc. 6). Following approval of the state court, the parties filed a petition to approve the settlement on September 1, 2011. (Doc. 7) Based upon the forgoing, there is good cause to vacate the scheduling conference in this matter.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: The Scheduling Conference set for September 22, 2011, at 9:00 am is VACATED.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Jennifer L. Thurston

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Reed v. Haight

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 21, 2011
Case No.: 1:11-cv-00926 AWIJLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)
Case details for

Reed v. Haight

Case Details

Full title:TANNER JUNE REED, a minor, by and through her guardian ad litem, PAMELA…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 21, 2011

Citations

Case No.: 1:11-cv-00926 AWIJLT (E.D. Cal. Sep. 21, 2011)