From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 31, 1968
206 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1968)

Opinion

No. 36626.

January 31, 1968.

Writ of Certiorari to the Florida Industrial Commission.

Masterson, Lloyd, Sundberg Rogers, and David T. Henniger, St. Petersburg, for petitioner.

Billy L. Rowe, of Harrison, Greene, Mann, Davenport, Rowe Stanton, St. Petersburg, Patrick H. Mears, Tallahassee, and J. Franklin Garner, Lakeland, for respondents.


By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date June 22, 1967.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is, therefore, dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is, therefore, denied.

The petition for attorneys' fees filed by Petitioner is also denied.

THOMAS, Acting C.J., and ROBERTS, DREW, THORNAL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Reed v. Florida Industrial Commission

Supreme Court of Florida
Jan 31, 1968
206 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1968)
Case details for

Reed v. Florida Industrial Commission

Case Details

Full title:CLIFTON S. REED, PETITIONER, v. FLORIDA INDUSTRIAL COMMISSION ET AL.…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida

Date published: Jan 31, 1968

Citations

206 So. 2d 386 (Fla. 1968)