From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 2010
79 A.D.3d 1517 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)

Opinion

No. 509968.

December 23, 2010.

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (McDonough, J.), entered April 23, 2010 in Albany County, which, in a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78, granted respondent's motion to dismiss the petition.

Robert Reed, Malone, appellant pro se.

Andrew M. Cuomo, Attorney General, Albany (Frank Brady of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mercure, J.P., Peters, Lahtinen, McCarthy and Garry, JJ.


In 1993, petitioner was convicted of two counts of rape in the first degree and sentenced to consecutive prison terms of 8 1/3 to 25 years. On appeal, petitioner's conviction was affirmed, but his sentence was modified, in the interest of justice, with the prison terms ordered to be served concurrently ( People v Reed, 212 AD2d 962 [4th Dept 1995], lv denied 86 NY2d 739). Thereafter, in 1995, petitioner was convicted of two counts of promoting prison contraband in the first degree and was sentenced, as a predicate felony offender, to 2½ to 5 years in prison on each count, with the terms to be served concurrently to each other, but consecutively to his sentences for the rape convictions. Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge the computation of his sentence and, following respondent's motion to dismiss, Supreme Court dismissed the petition. Petitioner now appeals.

We affirm. The crux of petitioner's argument in this proceeding is that the Niagara County Court commitment upon which his 1993 sentence is premised is invalid. However, since Niagara County Court was not named as a party to this proceeding, and the Department of Correctional Services is "` conclusively bound by the contents of commitment papers accompanying a prisoner,'" Supreme Court correctly dismissed this proceeding for failure to name a necessary party ( Matter of Murray v Goord, 1 NY3d 29, 32, quoting Middleton v State of New York, 54 AD2d 450, 452, affd 43 NY2d 678; see Matter of Hill v Commissioner of Correctional Servs., 71 AD3d 1210).

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Reed v. Fischer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 23, 2010
79 A.D.3d 1517 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
Case details for

Reed v. Fischer

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT REED, Appellant, v. BRIAN FISCHER, as Commissioner…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 23, 2010

Citations

79 A.D.3d 1517 (N.Y. App. Div. 2010)
2010 N.Y. Slip Op. 9453
912 N.Y.S.2d 468

Citing Cases

Jackson v. Fischer

Petitioner contends that the 2009 commitment order is incorrect and inconsistent with the sentence pronounced…

Reed v. Fischer

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court (Feldstein, J.), entered April 25, 2011 in Franklin County, which…