Opinion
5:24-cv-00015-MTT-CHW
07-11-2024
CHEZ RENALDO REED, Plaintiff, v. SHAWN EMMONS, Defendant.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
MARC T. TREADWELL, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
Plaintiff Chez Renaldo Reed, who is currently being held in the Charles D. Hudson Transitional Center in Lagrange, Georgia, filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Compl., ECF No. 1. He also filed a motion for leave to proceed in this action in forma pauperis. Mot. for Leave to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, ECF Nos. 2 & 6. Thereafter, Plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis was granted, and Plaintiff was ordered to recast his complaint if he wanted to proceed with this action. Order, ECF No. 7. Plaintiff was given fourteen days to recast his complaint and was cautioned that his failure to do so could result in the dismissal of this case. Id.
More than fourteen days passed following entry of that order, during which Plaintiff did not file a recast complaint or otherwise respond to the order for him to do so. As a result, Plaintiff was ordered to show cause to the Court why this case should not be dismissed based on his failure to comply with the Court's orders. Order to Show Cause, ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given fourteen days to respond and was cautioned that his failure to do so would likely result in the dismissal of this case. Id.
More than fourteen days have now passed since the show cause order was entered, and Plaintiff has not responded to that order. Therefore, because Plaintiff has failed to respond to the Court's orders and has otherwise failed to prosecute this case, it is hereby ORDERED that this action be DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Brown v. Tallahassee Police Dep't, 205 Fed.Appx. 802, 802 (11th Cir. 2006) (per curiam) (“The court may dismiss an action sua sponte under Rule 41(b) for failure to prosecute or failure to obey a court order.”) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b) and Lopez v. Aransas Cty. Indep. Sch. Dist., 570 F.2d 541, 544 (5th Cir. 1978)).
SO ORDERED/