From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Parole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 27, 2018
Case No. 3:17-cv-130-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Nov. 27, 2018)

Opinion

Case No. 3:17-cv-130-KRG-KAP

11-27-2018

DARTY JAMES REED, Petitioner v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent


Memorandum Order

Petitioner's petition for a writ of mandamus was referred to Magistrate Judge Keith A. Pesto for proceedings in accordance with the Magistrates Act, 28 U.S.C.§ 636, and Local Civil Rule 72.

The Magistrate Judge filed a Report and Recommendation on November 2, 2017, ECF no. 8, recommending that the petition be denied before service.

The petitioner was notified that pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 636(b)(1) he had fourteen days to file written objections to the Report and Recommendation. The petitioner filed timely objections at ECF no. 9, but they are meritless.

After de novo review of the record of this matter, the Report and Recommendation, and the objections thereto, the following order is entered:

AND NOW, this 27th day of November, 2018, it is

ORDERED that the petitioner's petition for a writ of mandamus is denied. The Report and Recommendation is adopted as the opinion of the Court. The Clerk shall mark this matter closed.

BY THE COURT:

/s/_________

KIM R. GIBSON,

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Notice to counsel of record by ECF and by U.S. Mail to:

Darty James Reed, Reg. No. 35029-037

F.C.I. Loretto

P.O. Box 1000

Loretto, PA 15940


Summaries of

Reed v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Parole

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA
Nov 27, 2018
Case No. 3:17-cv-130-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Nov. 27, 2018)
Case details for

Reed v. Dist. of Columbia Bd. of Parole

Case Details

Full title:DARTY JAMES REED, Petitioner v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BOARD OF PAROLE…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA

Date published: Nov 27, 2018

Citations

Case No. 3:17-cv-130-KRG-KAP (W.D. Pa. Nov. 27, 2018)