Opinion
2:21-cv-01402 WBS DB P
10-04-2022
CHARLES C. REED, Petitioner, v. DANIEL CUEVA, Respondent.
ORDER
WILLIAM B. SHUBB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 10, 2022, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within 21 days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
Although it appears from the file that petitioner's copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, petitioner was properly served. It is the petitioner's responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local Rule 182(f), service of documents at the record address of the party is fully effective.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed August 10, 2022 (ECF No. 18) are adopted in full;
2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 14) is GRANTED; and
3. The petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 is DISMISSED as barred by the statute of limitations.
4. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability referenced in 28 U.S.C. § 2253.