From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Cates

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2023
22-cv-07282-JD (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2023)

Opinion

22-cv-07282-JD

01-09-2023

MYCHAL A. REED, Petitioner, v. BOB CATES, Respondent.


ORDER OF DISMISSAL RE: DKT. NOS. 2, 7, 9

JAMES DONATO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

This is a habeas case filed pro se by a state prisoner. However, petitioner submitted a letter indicating that the petition was erroneously sent to this court by prison staff. Dkt. No. 9. The Court construes this filing as a notice of voluntary dismissal under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1). Plaintiff's motion (Dkt. No. 9) is GRANTED and this case is DISMISSED without prejudice. All pending motions (Dkt. Nos. 2, 7) are VACATED. No fee is due. The Clerk is requested to send petitioner a copy of Dkt. Nos. 1, 2. A certificate of appealability is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Reed v. Cates

United States District Court, Northern District of California
Jan 9, 2023
22-cv-07282-JD (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2023)
Case details for

Reed v. Cates

Case Details

Full title:MYCHAL A. REED, Petitioner, v. BOB CATES, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of California

Date published: Jan 9, 2023

Citations

22-cv-07282-JD (N.D. Cal. Jan. 9, 2023)