From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed v. Amira Nature Foods Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 12, 2016
Case No. CV 15-0957 FMO (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2016)

Opinion

Case No. CV 15-0957 FMO (PJWx)

08-12-2016

ROBERT REED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. AMIRA NATURE FOODS LTD., et al., Defendants.


ORDER DISMISSING ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE

On July 18, 2016, the court issued an order granting lead plaintiff leave to file a Third Amended Complaint no later than August 4, 2016. Lead plaintiff was "cautioned that failure to timely file a Third Amended Complaint may result in this action being dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute and/or failure to comply with a court order." (Dkt. 143, Court's Order of July 18, 2016, at 26); see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Link v. Wabash R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-30, 82 S.Ct. 1386, 1388 (1962). As of the filing date of this order, no Third Amended Complaint has been filed. (See, generally, Dkt.). Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that the above-captioned case is dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with the orders of the court. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Dated this 12th day of August, 2016.

/s/_________

Fernando M. Olguin

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Reed v. Amira Nature Foods Ltd.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Aug 12, 2016
Case No. CV 15-0957 FMO (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2016)
Case details for

Reed v. Amira Nature Foods Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:ROBERT REED, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Aug 12, 2016

Citations

Case No. CV 15-0957 FMO (PJWx) (C.D. Cal. Aug. 12, 2016)