From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reed Elsevier Inc. v. Watch Holdings, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 2006
30 A.D.3d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)

Opinion

8775, 8776, 8776A.

June 13, 2006.

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Harold B. Beeler, J.), entered April 13, 2005, awarding defendant the principal sum of $1,559,079.57 in past due rent, unanimously affirmed, with costs. Appeals from orders, same court and Justice, entered April 8 and 11, 2005, unanimously dismissed, without costs, as subsumed in the appeal from the judgment.

The Law Offices of John T. Brennan, P.C., Brooklyn (John T. Brennan of counsel), for appellant.

Kramer Levin Naftalis Frankel LLP, New York (Ronald S. Greenberg of counsel), for respondent.

Before: Mazzarelli, J.P., Andrias, Nardelli, Gonzalez and Malone, JJ., Concur.


The court properly dismissed the tenant's complaint since the lease required arbitration of the dispute over defendant owner's right to payments under an escalator clause in the lease. Contrary to plaintiff's contention, the instant arbitration clause governing disputes as to "the amount" the tenant must pay as additional rent based on the owner's operating expenses is broader than that in Matter of 100 William Co. v. Aetna Ins. Co. ( 163 AD2d 170, 171, lv denied 76 NY2d 712), which was limited to "the . . . proper manner to compute" the adjustment at issue.


Summaries of

Reed Elsevier Inc. v. Watch Holdings, LLC

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 13, 2006
30 A.D.3d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
Case details for

Reed Elsevier Inc. v. Watch Holdings, LLC

Case Details

Full title:REED ELSEVIER INC., Appellant, v. WATCH HOLDINGS, LLC, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 13, 2006

Citations

30 A.D.3d 222 (N.Y. App. Div. 2006)
2006 N.Y. Slip Op. 4774
817 N.Y.S.2d 21

Citing Cases

City of N.Y. v. Cenpark Realty

The motion court properly determined that the subject lease required arbitration of the dispute over…