From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reece v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 29, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0203 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)

Opinion

No. CIV S-10-0203 JAM EFB P.

September 29, 2011


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.

On August 9, 2011, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed August 9, 2011, are adopted in full; and

2. Defendants' November 19, 2010 motion to dismiss plaintiff's equal protection claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) is denied.

DATED: September 28, 2011


Summaries of

Reece v. Sisto

United States District Court, E.D. California
Sep 29, 2011
No. CIV S-10-0203 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)
Case details for

Reece v. Sisto

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES G. REECE, Plaintiff, v. D.K. SISTO, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Sep 29, 2011

Citations

No. CIV S-10-0203 JAM EFB P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 29, 2011)