From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reece v. Carey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 29, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1350-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2012)

Opinion

No. CIV S-09-1350-GEB-CMK-P

02-29-2012

CHARLES G. REECE, Plaintiff, v. TOM L. CAREY, et al., Defendants.


ORDER

Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to Eastern District of California local rules.

On January 26, 2012, the Magistrate Judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on the parties and which contained notice that the parties may file objections within a specified time. No objections to the findings and recommendations have been filed.

The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the Magistrate Judge's analysis.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed January 26, 2012, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss (Doc. 33) is denied; and

3. Defendant Dickenson shall file an answer to plaintiff's third amended complaint within 20 days of the date of this order.

_________________________

GARLAND E. BURRELL, JR.

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Reece v. Carey

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Feb 29, 2012
No. CIV S-09-1350-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2012)
Case details for

Reece v. Carey

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES G. REECE, Plaintiff, v. TOM L. CAREY, et al., Defendants.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Feb 29, 2012

Citations

No. CIV S-09-1350-GEB-CMK-P (E.D. Cal. Feb. 29, 2012)