From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redmond v. Wetzel

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 9, 2024
Civil Action 21-2652 (E.D. Pa. May. 9, 2024)

Opinion

Civil Action 21-2652

05-09-2024

DAQUAWAN REDMOND v. WETZEL, et al.


ORDER

CYNTHIA M. RUFE, J

AND NOW, this 9th day of May 2024, for the reasons stated in the Order approving the Report and Recommendation, it is hereby ORDERED that:

1. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DISMISSED without a hearing.
2. A certificate of appealability will not issue as there is no basis for concluding that “reasonable jurists could debate whether . . . the petition should have been resolved in a different manner or that the issues presented were adequate to deserve encouragement to proceed further;” and
3. The Clerk of Court is directed to CLOSE the case.

Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000) (internal citation and quotation omitted).

It is so ORDERED.


Summaries of

Redmond v. Wetzel

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
May 9, 2024
Civil Action 21-2652 (E.D. Pa. May. 9, 2024)
Case details for

Redmond v. Wetzel

Case Details

Full title:DAQUAWAN REDMOND v. WETZEL, et al.

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: May 9, 2024

Citations

Civil Action 21-2652 (E.D. Pa. May. 9, 2024)