From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redmond v. U.S. Bank NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2015
No. 15 C 10415 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 10, 2015)

Opinion

No. 15 C 10415

12-10-2015

LOIS REDMOND, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK NA, Defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

The motion to proceed in forma pauperis is denied. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with her complaint, she must file a new application which answers questions 4e and 4f. Furthermore, Plaintiff's complaint simply says that on August 27, 2015, Plaintiff "was being forced/coerced into signing agreed Court Order which violates" Plaintiff's constitutional rights. Neither the "Court Order" nor the "constitutional rights" are described. Without a specific description of the Court Order and the alleged coercion, the case could not go forward. The plaintiff must be specific in order to pursue her claim.

ENTER:

/s/

James B. Zagel

United States District Judge DATE: December 10, 2015


Summaries of

Redmond v. U.S. Bank NA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION
Dec 10, 2015
No. 15 C 10415 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 10, 2015)
Case details for

Redmond v. U.S. Bank NA

Case Details

Full title:LOIS REDMOND, Plaintiff, v. U.S. BANK NA, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS EASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Dec 10, 2015

Citations

No. 15 C 10415 (N.D. Ill. Dec. 10, 2015)