From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redmond v. Hatch

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1906
50 Misc. 643 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)

Opinion

April, 1906.

Thomas C. McDonald, for appellant.

Rollins Rollins, for respondents.


The testimony shows that the plaintiff, who was a police officer, while standing at a street crossing, regulating traffic on the streets, and in such a position that he could not see the defendants' driver, was knocked down and run over in broad daylight; that the driver of the defendants' horses had ample room to pass plaintiff without striking him, and that there was nothing to obscure the vision of the driver. The driver was not called on the trial.

We are of the opinion that the plaintiff showed that he was free from contributory negligence, and that the injuries that he received were caused through the negligence of the defendants' driver.

Judgment appealed from is reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to the appellant to abide the event.

Present: SCOTT, TRUAX and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Redmond v. Hatch

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1906
50 Misc. 643 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
Case details for

Redmond v. Hatch

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM J. REDMOND, Appellant, v . FREDERICK W. HATCH et al., Respondents

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Apr 1, 1906

Citations

50 Misc. 643 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
98 N.Y.S. 1111