From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 11, 1985
377 N.W.2d 459 (Minn. 1985)

Opinion

C4-85-179, C0-85-180.

December 11, 1985.


ORDER

Based upon all the files records, and proceedings herein,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the petitions for further review are granted for the limited purpose of considering the propriety of the remand to the trial court for a determination of comparative fault on issues of both fraud and negligence and the question of whether it was error to submit to the jury Vernon Rediske's claim of negligence against Minnesota Valley Breeder's Association and Maust. Other issues to which the petitions have been addressed will not be considered by the court. The petitioner shall proceed as the appellant and briefs shall be filed in the quantity, form and within the time limitations contained in Minn.R.Civ.App.P. 131 and 132. Counsel will be notified at a later date of the time for argument before this court. No requests for extensions of time for the filing of briefs will be entered.


Summaries of

Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n

Supreme Court of Minnesota
Dec 11, 1985
377 N.W.2d 459 (Minn. 1985)
Case details for

Rediske v. Minnesota Valley Breeders' Ass'n

Case Details

Full title:Vernon H. REDISKE, et al., Appellants, Respondents (C0-85-180), v…

Court:Supreme Court of Minnesota

Date published: Dec 11, 1985

Citations

377 N.W.2d 459 (Minn. 1985)

Citing Cases

Williams Pipe Line v. City of Mounds View

Mounds View asserts that the distinction made in Eisert between personal injury claims and property damage…

Independent School D. 622 v. Keene Corp.

The supreme court granted review on this issue, but the issue was not resolved. See Rediske v. Minnesota…