From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redgate v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sep 30, 2014
163 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)

Opinion

No. 2D14–4298.

09-30-2014

Bradley REDGATE, Appellant / Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee / Respondent(s).


Opinion

BY ORDER OF THE COURT.

The petitioner's “motion for 3.850” is treated as a petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The petition is denied. This is denial is without prejudice to the petitioner to file a renewed “petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel” within the time limits defined in Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.141(d)(5). The renewed petition must be sworn, must include the contents required by rule 9.141(d)(4) (in particular a statement of the “specific acts” that petitioner believes constitute ineffective assistance), and must be served on the attorney general at 3507 E. Frontage Road, Suite 200, Tampa, Florida, 33607. The renewed petition should refer to the present case number and this order.

WALLACE, LaROSE, and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Redgate v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.
Sep 30, 2014
163 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)
Case details for

Redgate v. State

Case Details

Full title:Bradley REDGATE, Appellant / Petitioner(s), v. STATE of Florida, Appellee…

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

Date published: Sep 30, 2014

Citations

163 So. 3d 1199 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2014)