Redford v. State Bar of Ga.

Full title: MIKE REDFORD, Plaintiff, v. STATE BAR OF GEORGIA, et al., Defendants.

Court: UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF GEORGIA MACON DIVISION

Date published: May 27, 2020

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00155-TES-CHW (M.D. Ga. May. 27, 2020)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:19-cv-00155-TES-CHW

05-27-2020

MIKE REDFORD, Plaintiff, v. STATE BAR OF GEORGIA, et al., Defendants.

TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

ORDER ADOPTING THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S RECOMMENDATION

In his Recommendation [Doc. 26], the United States Magistrate Judge recommends that the Court deny Plaintiff's motion seeking relief based on the threat posed by COVID-19, which the magistrate judge liberally construed as a Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) motion for relief from judgment. No objections have been filed to the magistrate judge's Recommendation; therefore, the Court reviews his findings for clear error. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A). After careful review, the Court finds no clear error. Therefore, the Court ADOPTS the Recommendation [Doc. 26] and MAKES IT THE ORDER OF THE COURT. Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion [Doc. 25] is DENIED.

SO ORDERED, this 27th day May, 2020.

S/ Tilman E. Self, III

TILMAN E. SELF, III, JUDGE

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT