From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redfield v. Helin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 20, 1960
11 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

July 20, 1960


In an action, arising out of a boundary line dispute, to recover damages from defendants Helin, Alexander and Buko, for their trespass upon plaintiffs' land and to restrain them from further trespassing upon plaintiffs' land, in which defendant Helin asserted a counterclaim and cross complaint against plaintiffs and others to compel the determination of their claims to his (Helin's) land, the said defendant Helin appeals from so much of a judgment of the Supreme Court, Dutchess County, rendered May 11, 1959, after a nonjury trial, as, inter alia: (1) directs that plaintiffs recover $1,099.79 from defendants Helin, Alexander and Buko and permanently enjoins them from trespassing upon plaintiffs' premises; (2) declares that plaintiffs and Walsh defendants are the owners of their respective premises north of Cedar Hill Road; (3) declares that the Johnston and Dreyer defendants are the owners of their respective premises south of Cedar Hill Road; and (4) dismisses upon the merits the counterclaim and cross complaint. Judgment insofar as appealed from affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Nolan, P.J., Ughetta, Pette and Brennan, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Redfield v. Helin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 20, 1960
11 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Redfield v. Helin

Case Details

Full title:DAVID H. REDFIELD et al., Respondents, v. KUSTAA A. HELIN, Appellant, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 20, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 816 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)