From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redding v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 4, 1995
666 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 93-3749.

August 4, 1995.

Appeal from the Circuit Court, Bay County, Clinton E. Foster, J.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Paula S. Saunders, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Sonya Roebuck Horbelt, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant, William B. Redding, challenges his convictions for grand theft and perjury in connection with the improvement of real property, which arose following Redding's unsatisfactory performance under a contract in which he agreed to construct mini-storage warehouses. We reverse the convictions and sentences for the following reasons.

First, the state's evidence failed to establish specific intent to commit theft, which is an essential element of the crime. See Stramaglia v. State, 603 So.2d 536 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied, 613 So.2d 9 (Fla. 1992).

Second, the state failed to establish perjury under section 713.35, Florida Statutes (1989). Although the applications for payment were notarized, the notary testified that she did not administer an oath to Redding when he signed the applications. See Youngker v. State, 215 So.2d 318 (Fla. 4th DCA 1968).

No objection was made that such testimony was inadmissible on the ground that it was extrinsic evidence to a document which appeared complete on its face.

Based on our resolution of the first two issues, it is unnecessary to reach the remaining issues regarding the discovery violation and restitution.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions to discharge Redding.

MINER, J., concurs.

BENTON, J., concurs in result.


Summaries of

Redding v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Aug 4, 1995
666 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Redding v. State

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM B. REDDING, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Aug 4, 1995

Citations

666 So. 2d 921 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Spivey v. State

Theft is a specific intent crime. Redding v. State, 666 So.2d 921 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995). Voluntary intoxication…

Johnson v. State

Specific intent is an essential element of the crime of theft. Redding v. State, 666 So.2d 921, 922 (Fla. 1st…