(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Id. ; see also Redding v. State , 354 Ga. App. 525, 536 (4), 841 S.E.2d 192 (2020) ; Pickard v. State , 257 Ga. App. 642, 644 (2), 572 S.E.2d 660 (2002). In this case, despite his initial motion for a mistrial, Vazquez's counsel participated in drafting the curative instruction which the trial court ultimately delivered.
(Citation and punctuation omitted.) Redding v. State , 354 Ga. App. 525, 532 (1) (c), 841 S.E.2d 192 (2020). Moreover, the uncertainty of D. H.’s out-of-court identification does not warrant the reversal of Brown's conviction.
A trial court's decision to admit or exclude evidence is reviewed for a clear abuse of discretion. Redding v. State , 354 Ga. App. 525, 534 (3), 841 S.E.2d 192 (2020). OCGA § 24-9-901 (a) and (b) (4) provide: