Opinion
No. 5:12-CV-174 (CAR)
10-23-2012
ORDER ON THE UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S
RECOMMENDATION
Before the Court is the United States Magistrate Judge's Recommendation [Doc. 41] to deny in part Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and grant in part Defendants' Alternative Motion for a More Definite Statement [Doc. 31]. Defendants have not filed an Objection to the Recommendation. Upon review of the Recommendation and consideration of Plaintiff's Complaint, the Court agrees with the findings and conclusions of the United States Magistrate Judge. Thus, the Order and Recommendation [Doc. 41] is hereby ADOPTED AND MADE THE ORDER OF THE COURT, and Defendants' Motion to Dismiss or in the Alternative Motion for a More Definite State [Doc. 31] is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Defendants' Motion is GRANTED to the extent that it requests a more definite statement; Defendants' Motion is DENIED to the extent that it requests dismissal.
SO ORDERED, this 23rd day of October, 2012.
_________________
C. ASHLEY ROYAL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
LMH