From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redding v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 15, 2010
Civil Action 2:10-cv-00082 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2010)

Opinion

Civil Action 2:10-cv-00082.

September 15, 2010


ORDER


This matter is before the Court on Magistrate Judge Abel's July 27, 2010 Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed to the Report and Recommendation. The Court, having reviewed the record de novo, determines that there is substantial evidence of record supporting the administrative law judge's determination that plaintiff Tracy L. Redding is not disabled within the meaning of the Act.

Upon de novo review in accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B), the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation. Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Defendant's motion for summary judgment is GRANTED. The decision of the Commissioner of Social Security is AFFIRMED. The Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to enter JUDGMENT for defendant.

This action is hereby DISMISSED.

It is so ORDERED.

DATE: September 15, 2010


Summaries of

Redding v. Commissioner of Social Security

United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division
Sep 15, 2010
Civil Action 2:10-cv-00082 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2010)
Case details for

Redding v. Commissioner of Social Security

Case Details

Full title:Tracy L. Redding, Plaintiff v. Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Eastern Division

Date published: Sep 15, 2010

Citations

Civil Action 2:10-cv-00082 (S.D. Ohio Sep. 15, 2010)

Citing Cases

Lete v. Colvin

adopted sub nom. Pollard v. Comm'r of Soc. Sec., No. 1:10-CV-714, 2012 WL 95426 (S.D. Ohio Jan. 12, 2012);…

Daniels v. Commissioner of Social Security

The Court's review is limited to these specific objections. Its review of the objections is de novo. Redding…