From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reddick v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 23, 2011
460 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2011)

Opinion

No. 11-7043

12-23-2011

BELAY REDDICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARY M. MITCHELL; JOSEPH NEAL; R. KELSO; S. LATHROP, Defendants - Appellees.

Belay Reddick, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.


UNPUBLISHED

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Charleston. David C. Norton, Chief District Judge. (2:10-cv-02487-DCN)

Before MOTZ, DUNCAN, and DIAZ, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Belay Reddick, Appellant Pro Se. Barbara Murcier Bowens, Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Belay Reddick appeals the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Reddick v. Mitchell, No. 2:10-cv-02487-DCN (D.S.C. July 20, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED


Summaries of

Reddick v. Mitchell

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
Dec 23, 2011
460 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2011)
Case details for

Reddick v. Mitchell

Case Details

Full title:BELAY REDDICK, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. MARY M. MITCHELL; JOSEPH NEAL; R…

Court:UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

Date published: Dec 23, 2011

Citations

460 F. App'x 214 (4th Cir. 2011)