Opinion
6:08-cv-6.
June 1, 2011
ORDER
Plaintiff Wayne Reddick ("Reddick") filed a complaint against Defendant Joseph Hutcheson, II ("Hutcheson") for allegedly refusing to escort him to a doctor's appointment. See Doc. 1. The Court entered summary judgment in favor of Hutcheson on April 15, 2010. See Doc. 167. The Eleventh Circuit has affirmed this Court's order, see Doc. 186, and rejected Reddick's motion for reconsideration, see Doc. 199. Reddick has since filed, and this Court has denied, numerous motions that rehashed the general allegations of his original complaint. See Docs. 203, 205. He has now filed another such document, apparently seeking the Court's reconsideration of his case. See Doc. 207.
"Reconsideration of a previous order is an extraordinary remedy to be employed sparingly." Groover v. Michelin N. Am., Inc., 90 F. Supp. 2d 1236, 1256 (M.D. Ala. 2000). It is appropriate "only if the movant demonstrates that there has been an intervening change in the law, that new evidence has been discovered which was not previously available to the parties in the exercise of due diligence, or that the court made a clear error of law." McCoy v. Macon Water Auth., 966 F. Supp. 1209, 1222-23 (M.D. Ga. 1997).
Here, as in his previous motions, Reddick has failed to allege any basis for relief. His motion for reconsideration, see Doc. 207, is DENIED.