From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reddick v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 24, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1147 LEW KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-1147 LEW KJM P.

January 24, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner has requested the appointment of counsel. There currently exists no absolute right to appointment of counsel in habeas proceedings. See Nevius v. Sumner, 105 F.3d 453, 460 (9th Cir. 1996). However, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A authorizes the appointment of counsel at any stage of the case "if the interests of justice so require." See Rule 8(c), Fed.R. Governing § 2254 Cases. In the present case, the court does not find that the interests of justice would be served by the appointment of counsel at the present time.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner's January 11, 2008 motion for appointment of counsel is denied without prejudice to a renewal of the motion at a later stage of the proceedings.


Summaries of

Reddick v. Felker

United States District Court, E.D. California
Jan 24, 2008
No. CIV S-07-1147 LEW KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2008)
Case details for

Reddick v. Felker

Case Details

Full title:CLINTON MORRIS REDDICK, Petitioner, v. T. FELKER, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Jan 24, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-1147 LEW KJM P (E.D. Cal. Jan. 24, 2008)