From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reddekopp v. Saif

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 3, 1991
812 P.2d 47 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)

Opinion

WCB 89-09956; CA A67456

Argued and submitted July 3, 1991

Reversed and remanded July 3, 1991

Judicial Review from Workers' Compensation Board.

Brad G. Garber, Salem, argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the brief was Michael B. Dye, Salem.

John Reuling, Assistant Attorney General, Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Attorney General, and Virginia L. Linder, Solicitor General, Salem.

Before Richardson, Presiding Judge, and Newman and Deits, Judges.

PER CURIAM

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


Claimant seeks review of an order of the Workers' Compensation Board that affirmed and adopted the referee's order that upheld SAIF's denial of medical benefits. Claimant argues, and SAIF concedes, that the referee relied on certain medical reports that were not admitted in evidence. Because the referee's findings and conclusions, adopted by the Board, are not based on evidence in the record, we reverse and remand for reconsideration.

Reversed and remanded for reconsideration.


Summaries of

Reddekopp v. Saif

Oregon Court of Appeals
Jul 3, 1991
812 P.2d 47 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
Case details for

Reddekopp v. Saif

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Compensation of Daniel C. Reddekopp, Claimant. Daniel…

Court:Oregon Court of Appeals

Date published: Jul 3, 1991

Citations

812 P.2d 47 (Or. Ct. App. 1991)
812 P.2d 47