From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redd v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 20, 2019
No. 75300-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 20, 2019)

Opinion

No. 75300-COA

03-20-2019

CHARLES ALBERT REDD, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.


ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE

Charles Albert Redd, Jr. appeals from a judgment of conviction entered pursuant to an Alford plea of voluntary manslaughter with the use of a deadly weapon. Eighth Judicial District Court, Clark County; Eric Johnson, Judge.

North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25 (1970).

Redd argues his sentence amounts to cruel and unusual punishment because it is so disproportionate to his crimes that it shocks the conscience. Redd contends the district court improperly imposed sentence without consideration of Redd's mitigation evidence or his positive activities while incarcerated.

Regardless of its severity, "[a] sentence within the statutory limits is not 'cruel and unusual punishment unless the statute fixing punishment is unconstitutional or the sentence is so unreasonably disproportionate to the offense as to shock the conscience.'" Blume v. State, 112 Nev. 472, 475, 915 P.2d 282, 284 (1996) (quoting Culverson v. State, 95 Nev. 433, 435, 596 P.2d 220, 221-22 (1979)); see also Harmelin v. Michigan, 501 U.S. 957, 1000-01 (1991) (plurality opinion) (explaining the Eighth Amendment does not require strict proportionality between crime and sentence; it forbids only an extreme sentence that is grossly disproportionate to the crime).

The district court heard the arguments of the parties and Redd's mitigation evidence. The district court noted Redd had no justification for shooting the victim and he had a criminal history that included acts of violence. The district court concluded the appropriate sentence was a term of 48 to 120 months in prison for the primary offense plus a consecutive term of 48 to 120 months in prison for the deadly weapon enhancement, which was within the parameters provided by the relevant statutes, see NRS 193.165(1); NRS 200.080. Redd does not allege that those statutes are unconstitutional. We conclude the sentence imposed is not grossly disproportionate to the crimes and does not constitute cruel and unusual punishment. Accordingly, we

ORDER the judgment of conviction AFFIRMED.

/s/_________, J.

Tao

/s/_________, J.

Gibbons

/s/_________, J.

Bulla cc: Hon. Eric Johnson, District Judge

Nguyen & Lay

Attorney General/Carson City

Clark County District Attorney

Eighth District Court Clerk


Summaries of

Redd v. State

COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Mar 20, 2019
No. 75300-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 20, 2019)
Case details for

Redd v. State

Case Details

Full title:CHARLES ALBERT REDD, JR., Appellant, v. THE STATE OF NEVADA, Respondent.

Court:COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

Date published: Mar 20, 2019

Citations

No. 75300-COA (Nev. App. Mar. 20, 2019)