From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Redcross v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 19, 1989
545 N.E.2d 633 (N.Y. 1989)

Opinion

Submitted June 10, 19, 1989

Decided September 19, 1989


Motion [by defendants-appellants] for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution.

Motion [by plaintiffs] for leave to appeal dismissed for failure to show that the order sought to be appealed from is final as required by section 500.11 (d) (1) (iv) of the Court of Appeals Rules of Practice (22 N.Y.CRR 500.11 [d] [1] [iv]).


Summaries of

Redcross v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Sep 19, 1989
545 N.E.2d 633 (N.Y. 1989)
Case details for

Redcross v. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company

Case Details

Full title:CARL REDCROSS et al., Individually and as Parents and Natural Guardians of…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Sep 19, 1989

Citations

545 N.E.2d 633 (N.Y. 1989)
546 N.Y.S.2d 343
74 N.Y.2d 836