From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Red v. Rackley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 9, 2016
NO. EDCV 15-2028-BRO (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2016)

Opinion

NO. EDCV 15-2028-BRO (KS)

06-09-2016

STEVEN JAMES RED, Petitioner, v. RONALD RACKLEY, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus ("Petition"), all of the records herein, the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge ("Report"), and Petitioner's Objections to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation ("Objections"). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(C) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), the Court has conducted a de novo review of those portions of the Report to which objections have been stated.

The Court concludes that the arguments presented in the Objections do not affect or alter the analysis and conclusions set forth in the Report.

Having completed its review, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations set forth in the Report. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that: (1) the Petition is DENIED; and (2) Judgment shall be entered dismissing this action with prejudice.

IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: June 9, 2016

/s/_________

HON. BEVERLY REID O'CONNELL

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Red v. Rackley

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jun 9, 2016
NO. EDCV 15-2028-BRO (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2016)
Case details for

Red v. Rackley

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN JAMES RED, Petitioner, v. RONALD RACKLEY, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jun 9, 2016

Citations

NO. EDCV 15-2028-BRO (KS) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 9, 2016)