From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Red Lion Area School District v. Bradbury

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 1, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-cv-00563-JF, CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-cv-00720-JF (E.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 2007)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-cv-00563-JF, CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-cv-00720-JF.

October 1, 2007


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Plaintiff Red Lion Area School District has moved for reconsideration of an order denying its motion to remand. The school district plaintiffs allege that one of the fraudulent conveyances chargeable to the defendant Bradbury was his use of over $7 million of his own money to set up what purports to be a § 401(k) retirement plan. This Court's Order of April 9, 2007, held that removal was proper because the action was preempted by ERISA. Upon further consideration of the issue as set forth in the motion to remand, I conclude that the matter properly belongs in state court.

As I noted in the earlier decision, the issue to be decided is whether a lawsuit challenging the establishment of an ERISA plan as a fraudulent conveyance, and seeking transfer of all of the assets of such a plan, is preempted by ERISA. In determining that it was, I relied upon the test established by the Supreme Court in Grable Sons Metal Prod., Inc. v. Darue Eng'g Mfg., 545 U.S. 308 (2005). After reviewing the holding of Grable Sons (which was not an ERISA case) in conjunction with the preemption provisions of the ERISA statute, I am satisfied that the initial ruling was in error. Because the plaintiffs are not participants or beneficiaries under the plan, they have no independent claim under ERISA, and any defenses the defendants have under the statute did not provide a basis for removal. See Dukes v. U.S. Healthcare, Inc., 57 F.3d 350 (3d Cir. 1995).

Although the plaintiffs in Civil Action No. 07-720 did not move for reconsideration, the same reasoning applies to both cases. I will remand the Perkiomen Valley School District matter under the Court's inherent authority to reconsider an earlier ruling.

Appropriate orders follow.

ORDER

AND NOW, this 1st day of October 2007, it is hereby ORDERED that upon the Court's own motion, and for the reasons expressed in the accompanying memorandum, the case is REMANDED to the Court of Common Pleas of Chester County, Pennsylvania.


Summaries of

Red Lion Area School District v. Bradbury

United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Oct 1, 2007
CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-cv-00563-JF, CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-cv-00720-JF (E.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 2007)
Case details for

Red Lion Area School District v. Bradbury

Case Details

Full title:RED LION AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT v. ROBERT J. BRADBURY, Individually and as…

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Oct 1, 2007

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-cv-00563-JF, CIVIL ACTION NO. 07-cv-00720-JF (E.D. Pa. Oct. 1, 2007)

Citing Cases

Hirt v. City of Casper

A distinction has been recognized between cases where the maker of the improvement admitted the accrual of…

Anderson v. Drainage Levee District

J.L. Fort, G.W. Munger and Haff, Mescrry, German Michaels for appellants. (1) The court erred in sustaining…