Summary
stating that "the absence of an age discussion is not necessarily a fatal flaw, nor does it, in some cases, even compel a return of the cause"
Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Skaggs v. Indus. Comm.Opinion
2000.
From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research
Reconsideration Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 2000
731 N.E.2d 688 (Ohio 2000)
Summaries of
Reconsideration Docket
Supreme Court of Ohio
Jan 1, 2000
731 N.E.2d 688 (Ohio 2000)
stating that "the absence of an age discussion is not necessarily a fatal flaw, nor does it, in some cases, even compel a return of the cause"
Summary of this case from State ex Rel. Skaggs v. Indus. Comm.Case details for
Reconsideration Docket
Case Details
Full title:RECONSIDERATION DOCKET
Court:Supreme Court of Ohio
Date published: Jan 1, 2000
Citations
731 N.E.2d 688 (Ohio 2000)
89 Ohio St. 3d 1443
Citing Cases
State ex Rel. Skaggs v. Indus. Comm.
{¶ 10} Even assuming, arguendo, that the commission's review of relator's age was cursory, the absence of a…
State ex Rel. Consol. Coal Co. v. AlexanderHere, the commission only listed evidence it relied upon, and it did not list evidence it considered. In…