From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Reclamation District No. 70 v. Blackmer

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Jan 10, 1911
159 Cal. 801 (Cal. 1911)

Opinion

Sac. No. 1785, Sac. No. 1786, Sac. No. 1787, Sac. No. 1788, Sac. No. 1789,Sac. No. 1790, Sac. No. 1791, Sac. No. 1792, Sac. No. 1793, Sac. No. 1794.

January 10, 1911.

APPEALS from judgments of the Superior Court of Sutter County. K.S. Mahon, Judge.

The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Reclamation District No. 70 v. Birks, ante, p. 233.

Arthur C. Huston, for Appellants.

A.H. Hewitt, and A.L. Shinn, for Respondent.


It having been stipulated that decisions in the above entitled cases should depend upon the decision in Reclamation District No. 70 v. John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [ 113 P. 170], this day decided, and that such judgment of this court as might be made and given in the case of Reclamation District No. 70 v. John Birks (Sac. No. 1784), ante, p. 233, [ 113 P. 170], should also be given in the above entitled cases.

It is ordered as to the above entitled cases, and each of them, that the judgment and order appealed from be reversed.

Hearing in Bank of each of above entitled cases respectively denied.

Beatty, C.J., dissented from the respective orders denying a hearing in Bank of each of above entitled cases.


Summaries of

Reclamation District No. 70 v. Blackmer

Supreme Court of California,Department Two
Jan 10, 1911
159 Cal. 801 (Cal. 1911)
Case details for

Reclamation District No. 70 v. Blackmer

Case Details

Full title:RECLAMATION DISTRICT NO. 70, Respondent, v. WESLEY BLACKMER et al.…

Court:Supreme Court of California,Department Two

Date published: Jan 10, 1911

Citations

159 Cal. 801 (Cal. 1911)
113 P. 174

Citing Cases

Mayflower Hotel Stockhlds. v. Mayflower Hotel

ce Comm. v. City of Indianapolis, 1922, 193 Ind. 37, 45, 137 N.E. 705; Smith, Trustee, et al. v. Wells…